Incentivizing new energy and environmental technologies

Date: 11/01/07

Summary: Newt explains the benefits of “incentivizing” development of new energy and environmental technologies, showing that there are potential positives for biodiversity and for the economy.

Having trouble hearing this podcast? Download the file to your computer by right-clicking here and selecting "save as" or "save target".

“And so part of what we’re suggesting is: if you look around at every single major environmental challenge and try to organize it so it’s a management problem first; what are the values we’re trying to achieve, what’s a vision of success in achieving them, how could we incentivize people to achieve them, that we think you can make dramatically faster breakthroughs, and you can actually produce a planet which is much, much more diverse in terms of biological diversity, is much cleaner, has much lower carbon loading, and does so in a way that is economically rational, and therefore is much easier to get India and China to adopt, because it actually makes economic sense as well as environmental sense. And that, I think, is close to the core of what we’re trying to say in A Contract With the Earth.”



TagTag | Email Email | Print Print |

Rating
Comments
By Gatorwest @ Tuesday, April 29, 2008 8:39 PM
Incentives are great to stimulate new innovations and technologies. But we pretty much already have everything we need to get this done.

The Department of Energy spent around 220 million per year since 2004 on the Presidents Hydrogen energy initiative. And the Hydrogen fuel-cell SUV's http://www.chevrolet.com/fuelcell/ and Hydrogen burning busses http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=27904 are now rolling on our streets as a result.

Here is what we need next: http://www.fuelcells.org/thomasstudy.pdf

GM now estimates that an initial nationwide hydrogen infrastructure to support 1 million FCVs and to place a hydrogen fueling pump within 2 miles of the homes of 70% of the US population as well as every 25 miles on the interstates connecting the 100 largest cities would cost between $10 billion and $15 billion. Less than what ExxonMobil paid in income taxes last year.

So the government provides the tax breaks, incentives, and helps with the infrastructure. And we get there. The $220 million per year is nothing compared to this problem.

It is all right in front of us.

The only thing missing is the LEADERSHIP!

By Anonymous @ Tuesday, April 29, 2008 2:33 PM
The following comments could have been written by me. The fact that you accept their argument that we are the cause of global warming (and appear w/ one of the biggest problems we have as a nation in a commercial) or that we even have the ability to cause it greatly diminishes my view of you. If the people of America are only told the truth on why we are not producing our own oil and energy (and paying 3.50 a gal.) they will throw the bums out. There is nothing like providing you enemies with the money the need to attack you...........
Why do we need incentives at all? Incentives/subsidies are what gave us the ethenol mess.
We don't need Central Planning with incentives from the government. Just get rid of the road blocks and let us drill from more oil in the continental US, for example.
By Anonymous @ Sunday, April 20, 2008 9:33 PM
I am tired of green and global warming. I don't believe that humans are capable of changing climate in any way. I am tired of people saying that the debate is over when it never took place. I am tired of people telling me to use curly cue light bulbs when they contain poison and you can not even throw them away like a normal light bulb. Prove to me that there is global warming. Let the debate be and maybe I will change my mind
By Anonymous @ Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:00 PM
Don't let the innovators who could give the world a free market, ever-expanding prosperity be thwarted by the bureaucrats who foresee an only possible world of limited energy, resources and population.

By Anonymous @ Tuesday, April 29, 2008 11:43 AM
Working together and thinking together is our green answer. Each of us look at the same problem colored just a little differently. By taking the same situation and compiling all our views we will enable innovative problem solving to the next generation. This needs to be done on a national level with world wide input.

By Anonymous @ Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:06 PM
Why do we need incentives at all? Incentives/subsidies are what gave us the ethenol mess.
We don't need Central Planning with incentives from the government. Just get rid of the road blocks and let us drill from more oil in the continental US, for example.

By Anonymous @ Sunday, April 20, 2008 9:33 PM
I am tired of green and global warming. I don't believe that humans ard capable of changing climate in any way. I am tired of people saying that the debate is over when it never took place. I am tired of people telling me to use curly cue light balbs when they contain poison andyou can not even throw them away like a normal light balb. Prove to me that there is global warming. Let the debate be and maybe I will change my mind

By Anonymous @ Wednesday, April 02, 2008 11:00 PM
Don't let the innovators who could give the world a free market, ever-expanding prosperity be thwarted by the bureaucrats who foresee an only possible world of limited energy, resources and population.

Click Here to post a comment