spacer
 HOME |  MY NEWT.ORG | AMERICAN SOLUTIONS | CHT | PARA LATINOS |
Reagan Two Speeches Evil Empire
Recommended Sites
Fighting Back With Rediscovering God in America

I got a note this week that reminded me, once again, how much the American people disagree with the Washington elite -- and how differently we would run our country if and when we get the chance.

The note told the story of Mrs. Arnold, an 85-year-old grandmother living in Florida.

Every year, Mrs. Arnold looks forward to a Christmas visit to her apartment building by a local Sunday school class. They have a Christmas party and place an angel at the top of the building's Christmas tree.

But this year, the management of her apartment complex issued a directive: Any and all "religious symbols or religious words associated with Christmas" are banned from the public areas of the building.

The Anti-Religious Bigotry of Lawsuit Expectations

Even the word "Christmas" was banned. The residents were told to use "holiday" instead (an irony not picked up by the elites since the word "holiday" is derived from "Holy Day").

The management company blamed federal regulations for its anti-religious directive. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) denies that this is their policy, but they say that religious bans like this are commonplace.

Anti-religious zealots have put property owners and managers on the defensive. Rather than risk a lawsuit, they issue blanket prohibitions that amount to nothing less than anti-religious bigotry.

It's another example of the biases of the elites -- in this case, anti-religious bigotry -- being imposed on the American people.

Fighting Back With Rediscovering God in America

One of the main reasons I wrote Rediscovering God in America: Reflections on the Role of Faith in Our Nation's History and Future was to combat this anti-religious bigotry.

As I mentioned last week, Rediscovering God in America has now been made into a documentary movie, featuring Callista, me and a host of American historians and commentators.

You can watch a preview of the movie and buy a copy of the DVD here.

The message of both the movie and the book is simple and direct: There is no attack on American culture more destructive and more historically dishonest than the anti-religious bigotry of much of the nation's legal and political elite.

Hiding 'Laus Deo' Under a Bushel

The anti-religious elites' attempts to drive God out of America's public square are serious and ongoing.

For example: One of the places we visit in Rediscovering God in America is the Washington Monument.

The monument's capstone is one of Washington's most profound acknowledgements of the centrality of God and faith to our nation. Etched in aluminum, the East side of the capstone reads "Laus Deo," Latin for "Praise be to God."

But recently, visitors to the Washington Monument noticed that a display plaque describing the capstone was changed to omit the words "Laus Deo" and any reference to God.

What's more, a replica of the capstone had been positioned so visitors could not see the side reading "Laus Deo."

Thanks to an e-mail campaign by outraged Americans, the references to God on the displays have now been restored. But the incident serves as a reminder of the near-constant threat of anti-religious bigotry in America.

When It Comes to Anti-Religious Bigotry, All Religions Are NOT Equal

Of course, when it comes to official anti-religious bigotry, not all religions are equal.

Did you know that, while religious images are under assault across the nation, in nine Western states the courts have ruled it constitutional for public schools to require a three-week course on the Islamic faith -- a course in which all junior-high students are mandated to pretend they are Muslims and offer prayers to Allah?

This is the same court, mind you, that infamously ruled (in the case brought by atheist activist Michael Newdow) that it is unconstitutional for students to mention "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance.

What America Really Believes at AmericanSolutions.com

The anti-religious biases of the legal and government elites are impossible to square with the values and opinions of the American people.

At AmericanSolutions.com, you can view my presentation of six nationwide polls recently conducted by American Solutions that show how out of touch the government elite are on religion and so many other issues.

Far from believing that religion should be banished from our public life, majorities of Americans believe that there is not enough religion and morality in:

  • Movies and television (72%);

  • The home life of children (71%);

  • Public schools (64%); and

  • Decision-making by our elected officials (60%).

The Values of Red, White and Blue America

Here's a sampling of the American people's most widely held views. Compare and contrast these views with what you hear and see coming out of Washington today:

  • 96% believe it is important for the President and Congress to address the issue of Social Security in the next few years.

  • 94% believe children should be allowed a moment of silence to pray to themselves in public school if they desire.

  • 93% believe al Qaeda poses a very serious threat to the United States.

  • 93% believe, in the worker visa program, that each worker should take an oath to obey the United States law and to be deported if the worker commits a crime while in the United States.

  • 93% believe it is important to acknowledge today the reference to God in the Declaration of Independence -- that we are endowed by our Creator with the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

  • 92% believe our focus should clearly be to provide long-term solutions instead of short-term fixes.

  • 91% believe we should dramatically increase our investment in math and science education.

  • 91% believe we should hold city governments to the same standards for cleaning waste water as are applied to the private industry.

  • 90% approve of a Christmas tree or a Menorah being placed on public property during the holiday season.

Our Veterans: Protecting the Freedom That God Has Given Us

One of the cornerstones of America's historical religious faith is the assertion, made so clearly in our Declaration of Independence, that our freedom comes from God.

This was a revolutionary proclamation in the history, not only of America, but of humankind. It means that no government or king grants us our freedom -- and no government or king can legitimately take it away. Our freedom is ours by virtue of the fact that we are all created by God.

But if our freedom comes from our Creator, it is protected and sustained by the men and women who serve our country when it needs it most.

Our God-given freedom was protected and sustained by my father, who served in World War II, Korea and Vietnam.

It is protected and sustained by the men and women serving in Iraq and throughout the world today.

Everyday, but most especially this Veterans' Day week, we owe our veterans the acknowledgment that they are the guardians of God's blessing of freedom. And we are their grateful beneficiaries.


Newt Gingrich

P.S. -- A special thanks to all our readers for achieving an important milestone this week: "Winning the Future" is now received by more than half a million people. If you have friends and colleagues on your email list who you think would enjoy this newsletter, invite them to sign up to receive it free of charge here and join the over 500,000 people getting it weekly. And thanks to everyone reading who had already done so.

P.P.S. -- Another thanks to all of you who have bought my new book, Contract with the Earth, and all those who have come out to see me on my book tour. I am not surprised (according to our American Solutions poll, 95% of Americans believe we have an obligation to be good stewards of God's creation), but I am very gratified with how well Contract with the Earth and "green conservatism" have been received by Americans. Thanks again.

P.P.P.S. -- Yesterday, my daughter Jackie wrote about her trip with her sister Kathy to Greece to complete a marathon for Arthritis. You can read about their trip here.



TagTag | Email Email | Print Print |
Comments
By John Ansell @ Monday, November 19, 2007 6:53 PM
Matt, Many thanks for all your great work. We appreciate the same.

Dear See Bee, I don't know what's up with the Journal Register. Seems the new editor is really left and then out of the blue, they run pro conservative. http://www.sj-r.com/News/stories/20326.asp

This one is a slight against my uncle Ossie. Pat Ward is a great guy and they make it out to make it my Uncle's fault for doing away with the position as a bad thing.

By Matt Scofield @ Monday, November 19, 2007 10:25 AM
John and others I definitely appreciate your feedback on making the new site more effective. I'm working quite hard on implementing a solution that will hopefully be just as easy to use as the old one. Please keep the feedback coming, you'll see changes soon!

By Yairio @ Sunday, November 18, 2007 9:57 PM
I want a forum... :(

By seebee @ Sunday, November 18, 2007 5:04 PM
Hey John, We'll see if this comment ever gets added. Check out again how our Illinois democrats are doing business (or not) in relation to "the moment of slience" in our schools. Today, the column in the State Journal Register, "The Statehouse Insider", explains the not so brilliant leadership of the democrats.
http://www.sj-r.com/news/statehouse/2007/11/18/statehouse_insider/
By changing the word "may" and making the moment of silence mandatory, they invited lawsuits." The democrats seem to be micro-managers of the innane and inappropriate, but can't manage to tackle the big problems of providing a stable, fair, source of revenue to fund our Illinois schools which are housed in crumbling, ancient buildings.

By John Ansell @ Friday, November 16, 2007 12:21 PM
P.S., we could also change our typos on the old site. That way when we go of on a rant we could revisit and correct our post. Sorry for the errors. above but the point remains.

By John Ansell @ Friday, November 16, 2007 12:12 PM
Now on the old site, we would have about 5 to 6 comments already posted and people would start phoning and faxing and emailing the Illinois judge. Today, this comment will be the last one posted. I'm really don't mean this to be a knock on the new site, as the new site is great. But if there is a way to add a forum similar to the old one, that would be even better. For instance, in the old post I would have asked: Is a moment of silence Prayer? There would have been others debating it. Here, today, we will see no responses. On such a serious issue. An issue that is alive and can be change with all our efforts (think we didn't help derail amnesty with the help of your old site? If you do, you're selling yourself short). Thanks.

By John Ansell @ Friday, November 16, 2007 12:05 PM
Newt, I'm trying to fight the good fight. Spreading the word and all. I thank you for allowing me to post on your site as well as I feel I can reach more people this way. The sad part is that the comments are not comming in as they would have on the last site. For instance, I have a blog about a serious topic regarding our schools. 3 comments on the blog. 2 from myself. What's the problem? Athiest are trying to block a moment of silence in school.

Enforcing moment of silence blocked
Lawyer: All school districts may be added to lawsuit

By CARLA JOHNSON
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published Friday, November 16, 2007


CHICAGO - An atheist talk show host's attorney said Thursday he may try to add all Illinois school districts as defendants in a lawsuit challenging a mandatory moment of silence in classrooms.

Suing all 871 districts may be the best way to get a clear answer about the new state law's constitutionality, attorney Gregory Kulis said.
A federal judge in Chicago issued a preliminary injunction Thursday, temporarily blocking the state school superintendent from enforcing the Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act. The law requires a brief period of prayer or reflective silence at the start of every school day.

Atheist activist Rob Sherman and his 14-year-old daughter filed a lawsuit last month against the suburban Chicago district where she attends school. Districts should take the judge's latest ruling as a signal that the law violates the U.S. Constitution, Sherman said.

"It seems to me that the judge has indicated the law doesn't have a prayer," Sherman said.

Sherman says the law is an attempt to inject religion into public schools. His daughter is a freshman at Buffalo Grove High School in Township High School District 214.

Judge Robert Gettleman's ruling may leave teachers and principals confused about what they're supposed to do now, Kulis said.

At Thursday's hearing, the judge and attorneys discussed adding all the school districts as a "defendant class," and the judge gave Kulis until Dec. 6 to decide whether to file a motion seeking the change.

A spokesman for State School Superintendent Christopher Koch said Koch doesn't have a way to enforce the law because there are no penalties.

"It is up to each individual local district to make the decision to comply with any state law," said Koch spokesman Matt Vanover.

The judge's ruling came a day after he issued a similar injunction barring District 214 from enforcing the law. Gettleman was more specific in his directions to that district because it was named as a defendant in the case.

"This isn't our law. We didn't pass it. We're simply trying to do our best," said attorney Brian McCarthy, who represents District 214.

The judge set the next hearing in the case for Dec. 14.

Before a one-word change made by lawmakers, state law already let schools in Illinois have a moment of silence if they desired to do so. The new measure, which went into effect last month, changed the word "may" in the law to "shall," mandating a moment of silence or prayer.

State Rep. John Fritchey, D-Chicago, filed a bill in the legislature Thursday that would undo that change. The bill would remove the words "student prayer" from the law and allow teachers to conduct a moment of silence before each school day rather than requiring them to do so by changing the language from "shall observe" to "may conduct."

Sherman has filed previous lawsuits to remove religious symbols from the public sphere.

In 1989, he challenged a state law requiring public school students to recite the Pledge of Allegiance. He said that reciting in school the words "under God" contained in the pledge was unconstitutional.


Associated Press writer Ryan Keith in Springfield contributed to this report.

Click Here to post a comment

About Newt

Contact

Internships

FAQ's

Terms of Use

 
Powered By: Powered By iBelong Networks
spacer