 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Newt's Practical Proposals to Provide Insurance for the Working Poor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practical proposals are a powerful step in the right direction Atlanta Journal Constitution February 21, 2008 By NEWT GINGRICH The Georgia Uninsured Working Group has proposed a series of reforms that could help an estimated 500,000 currently uninsured Georgians purchase health insurance. That set of changes would cover one-third of all the uninsured in Georgia. It would be a big step forward and would be the first building block toward ultimately covering every Georgian with health insurance. Gov. Sonny Perdue deserves a lot of credit for encouraging and supporting this kind of sound, practical and doable reform. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution editorial board apparently dislikes the plan because it is incremental and it is market-oriented ("Pale attempt at a fix" @issue Feb. 8 ). Why would they prefer to do nothing and leave 500,000 Georgians uninsured? Do they seriously believe this legislature will pass a utopian big-government, big-tax-increase solution? Since that won't happen, why not take the first steps and help a half million people now? Why are they opposed to market-oriented solutions if they work? We should be seeking the most practical, common-sense and affordable health insurance system so every Georgian can buy health insurance at an affordable cost. This proposal is a powerful step in the right direction. It ought to be passed by the Legislature as rapidly as possible. Here is how it would work: • It eliminates unnecessary and hidden taxes imposed on the purchase of insurance that only drives up premiums and increases the numbers of those unable to afford coverage. • It allows financial rewards and incentives for preventive care, if healthy, and compliance incentives with physician-established treatment plans, if ill. • It encourages more flexible plan designs to better meet the insurance needs of individuals. • It provides expanded use of tax-advantage accounts that will encourage employers to contribute toward the purchase of individually owned policies for many working poor. • It provides a $250 tax credit per enrolled employee to encourage small businesses to provide health insurance, where now more than 65 percent do not offer insurance.
Read More
|
|
|
|
Tag
| Email |
Print
|
| Comments |
By
scooter52664 @
Saturday, March 01, 2008 6:25 AM
|
At what point in our development do we start to hold individuals accountable for their choices; hold them to personal responsibility?
At what point do we stop with the arrogance of thinking that the "working poor" are incapable of taking care of themselves?
At what point do we tell the citizens of our society that each choice made in life leads to an outcome for which you are accountable and must take ownership of your choice?
No more tax credits; no more bailouts; no more entitlements.
Why isn't there a poll about how sick and tired Americans are of paying into someone else's consequence-free-lifestyle.
|
|
|
By
ericrobinson @
Saturday, February 23, 2008 1:18 AM
|
|
What if employer were to deduct health insurance and retirement account contributions from worker's paychecks [before] they take out TAXES? Are we not entitled to live, be healthy and retire better than dogs, before we are obliged to pay for those same benefits of government workers? "Public Servants"?, I think not.
|
|
|
By
concepts2 @
Friday, February 22, 2008 7:24 PM
|
They oppose it precisely because it works, and because it works without tax increases and big government bureaucracy attached to it.
The longer I live, the more I am convinced that the left will always try to cram a square peg into a round hole just to spite Americans, because they are incapable of understanding that their solutions don't fit.
When told that tax cuts increased revenue, Hillary said "I don't care!" They're going to do it their way because they have an agenda.
|
|
|
Click Here to post a comment
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |