spacer
 HOME |  MY NEWT.ORG | AMERICAN SOLUTIONS | CHT | PARA LATINOS |
Reagan Two Speeches Evil Empire
Recommended Sites
The Politicians' Energy Crisis -- And Its Cure

In this week's Winning the Future I am going to focus on how Washington has created the high energy prices Americans are paying and what we can do to bring them down.

But first, I want to say a few words about last week's newsletter.

A Note on Last Week's Solutions: They Were Just the Beginning

Several commentators have noticed the difference between the scale of the challenge facing the Republican Party that I outlined in last week's newsletter and the relatively small number of proposals for change in that newsletter.

What they did not notice was that I specified in the newsletter that those proposals were just the beginning. There is a lot more to come.

This week's newsletter on energy is another building block toward creating the new, more solution-oriented movement toward real change. Anyone who wants to get a sense of the full scope of the changes I am working on can go to the Center for Health Transformation (healthtransformation.net) and to American Solutions (American Solutions.com).

You will read a lot more bold proposals in this newsletter over the next few months. (And it is encouraging to note that John Boehner and other House Republican Leaders are moving forward with outlining an aggressive agenda for real change of their own.)

We Can Thank Shortsighted Politicians for High Energy Prices

The starting point of any discussion of America's energy future has to be this: Shortsighted politicians have created the current energy crisis.

For decades left-leaning politicians have advocated higher prices and less energy. They were going to save the environment by punishing Americans into driving less and driving smaller cars. Now their policies have succeeded with a vengeance.

The very left wing politicians who favored a policy of no oil and gas exploration, no use of coal, no development of nuclear power, and no aggressive development of new technologies are now panic-stricken that their policies of higher prices have led to higher prices.

And now the same shortsighted, dishonest politicians who created the crisis are blaming everyone but themselves for the crisis. Because they refuse to be honest about the policies which led to this crisis, they can't be honest about the policies that will lead us out of it.

The politicians want scapegoats. The American people just want solutions.

The Solution? A Pro-Investment, Pro-Creativity, Pro-Production Energy Coalition

Politicians with vision -- working with entrepreneurs, scientists, and engineers -- could rapidly replace the current shortages and high prices with a flood of new energy at lower prices. And America's current vulnerability to blackmail by foreign dictators could rapidly be turned into virtual independence with a North American energy strategy that includes Canada and Mexico.

The key is to create a new coalition of Americans who favor greater investment, greater discovery, greater creativity, and greater production.

That coalition could lead to a new era of American prosperity with a more prosperous economy, more abundant energy, a healthier environment, and greater national security.

The Current Crisis of High Prices and Limited Supply

The fact is, with leadership that unleashes the potential of the American people, there is no reason why America can't have safe, abundant, and relatively inexpensive energy.

America still has the world's largest supply of fossil fuels. We have more coal than any other country by a huge margin. We have abundant oil and gas reserves. We have the potential for nuclear, wind, solar and biofuels in tremendous quantities.

And, critically, America is still technologically the most advanced nation in the world, despite decades of bad policies. We have the potential for enormous breakthroughs in future technologies such as hydrogen power.

Without Real Change the Energy Problem Will Get Much Worse

The second inescapable fact of America's energy future is this: India and China are realities. As they become more prosperous their people want to have better lives. And having better lives means using more and more energy.

This year Asia bought more cars than the United States for the first time in history. The pressure for more energy on a worldwide basis is going to continue to grow.

The only solutions to the current high prices and scarcity are higher energy supply and/or lower energy demand.

In the long run we will almost certainly find dramatic breakthroughs including electric cars (super hybrids) and hydrogen-powered vehicles.

But in the short and near term, oil is going to remain the primary source of energy for transportation. And any strategy that does not substantially increase the production of oil and the use of coal is a strategy for much higher prices and growing scarcities.

The Left's Strategy is Anti-Oil and Anti-Coal

Yet the current strategy of the left is anti-oil and anti-coal.

It is a recipe for very high prices for Americans who drive.

It is a recipe for higher inflation as the cost of energy is driven through the entire economy.

It is a recipe for growing vulnerability to blackmail by foreign dictatorships.

And it is a recipe for starving poor people in the third world. The price of oil has a much bigger impact on the cost of food than the production of biofuels. Higher oil prices mean higher fertilizer and transportation prices. Combine that with the impact of speculators and really destructive government policies (including the Left's opposition to scientifically improved food production), and you have a formula for starvation for the poorest people.

Americans Support Energy Independence, Innovation, Incentives, and Nuclear Power

At AmericanSolutions.com you can view the Platform of the American People, a collection of 91 planks with the support of the majority of Democrats, independents, and Republicans.

The Platform shows that the American people overwhelmingly agree that we should use our resources to become independent from foreign dictators.

Brazil recently discovered two very large oil fields in the Atlantic Ocean. They are so large that they will make Brazil completely independent from Middle Eastern oil.

This is important because the Minerals Management Service has estimated a mean of 85.9 billion barrels of undiscovered recoverable oil and a mean of 419.9 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered recoverable natural gas in the Federal Outer Continental Shelf of the United States. And that estimate does not include any Brazil-size surprise discoveries.

The Platform also shows that Americans believe deeply in the power of technology, incentives, and innovation to develop new sources of energy and new methods of energy conservation. For example:

  • "We can solve our environmental problems faster and cheaper with innovation and new technology than with more litigation and more government regulation. (79 to 15)

  • If we use technology and innovation and incentives we do not need to raise taxes to clean up our environment. (68 to 29)"

And Americans also believe in the safety and reliability of nuclear energy.

  • "We support building more nuclear power plants to cut carbon emissions. (65 to 28)"

The First Step: Replace Warner-Lieberman with Domenici

In a sign of how out of touch the Congress is with the current realities of the average American, the Senate is planning to bring up the Warner-Lieberman bill. This "tax and trade" bill will be an economic disaster. A better name for it would be "The China and India Full Employment Act" because it is going to raise the costs of doing business in America so dramatically that most future factories will be built outside the United States.

"Tax and trade" is a more accurate term than "cap and trade" because buried in this bill is a massive tax increase which will lead to a much bigger federal government with much more bureaucracy and a much smaller private sector operating only with the permission of federal bureaucrats.

At a time when the American driver is already complaining about the cost of gasoline and the American homeowner is beginning to complain about the cost of natural gas and home heating oil, the Warner-Lieberman bill will make those costs much worse.

Instead of turning to Warner-Lieberman, the Senate would send a better signal to the American people by taking up the American Energy Production Act, sponsored by New Mexico Senator Pete Domenici (R)

Where the Warner-Lieberman bill is one more step toward higher prices, more scarcity, and less production, the Domenici Bill is a first step toward trying to increase production.

If the Senate votes to bring up the Domenici Bill, they are beginning to get the message that we want more energy and lower prices.

The Next Steps to Clean, More Abundant, Lower Cost Domestic Energy

After switching focus from the Warner-Lieberman bill to the Domenici bill, here are the next steps toward an energy abundant American future:

  1. Change federal law to give all states with offshore oil and gas the same share of federal royalties Wyoming gets for land-based resources (48%). Today most states get zero royalties from offshore oil and gas development while states like Wyoming reap 48% of federal royalties for its land-based oil and gas. If Richmond, Tallahassee, and Sacramento suddenly had the potential to find billions of dollars a year in new revenues, their willingness to tolerate new oil and gas development with appropriate environmental safeguards might go up dramatically.

  2. Change federal law to allow those states that want to permit exploration with appropriate safeguards to do so. Companies could be required to post bonds to pay for any environmental problems, and a share of the state and federal revenues from new offshore development could be set aside to finance biodiversity and national park projects.

  3. Allow companies engaged in oil and gas exploration and development to write off their investments in one year by expensing all of it against their tax liabilities. This will lead to an explosion of new exploration and development.

  4. Immediately renegotiate the clean coal (FutureGen) project for Illinois to get it built as rapidly as possible (see the chapter in Real Change for rapid contracting techniques with incentives that can reduce construction time from years to months). It is utterly irrational for the Department of Energy to postpone the most advanced clean coal project in America (LEARN MORE ABOUT DOE'S FAILURE ON FUTURE GEN).

    Coal is America's most abundant and lowest-cost energy resource. If clean coal technologies can be demonstrated to produce power with virtually no carbon release, then coal becomes environmentally very acceptable. America IS the Saudi Arabia of coal. We simply must fund the most advanced experiment and get on with using our most abundant resource.

  5. Congress should pass a series of tax-free prizes to accelerate innovation in developing new technologies for using coal. The result will be a better environment, more energy independence, and more energy at lower cost. Eliminate half the Department of Energy bureaucracy and turn the money into paying for prizes. America will get a much bigger, faster return on its investment.

  6. Develop a tax credit for refitting existing coal plants. There are a lot of existing coal plants which are going to be around for a long time. The most efficient way to make them more environmentally acceptable is to create a tax credit for retrofitting them with new methods and new technologies.

  7. Pass a streamlined regulatory regime and a favorable tax regime for building nuclear power plants.

  8. Make the solar power and wind power tax credits permanent to create a large scale industry dedicated to domestically produced renewable fuel. A contractor recently told me about a solar project he had planned for the American southwest that is now being built in Spain because he distrusts the American Congress and is tired of it playing games with short-term tax credits. We have enormous opportunities in solar, wind, and other renewable fuels; and they can be developed with a stable tax policy.

  9. Develop long distance transmission lines to move wind power from the Dakotas to Chicago. The potential is there for an enormous amount of electricity generation, but it is locked up geographically because the neighboring states have no reason to be helpful. The Dakotas can generate the power and Chicago can use the power, but the federal government may have to make the connection possible.

  10. Allow the auto companies to use their tax credits for the cost of flex fuels cars, hybrids, and the development of hydrogen cars including necessary retooling for manufacturing. The American auto companies have billions in tax credits, but they have no profits to turn the tax credits into useful money. The federal government could make the tax credits refundable and therefore useful if they were spent on helping solve the energy problem. This would be a win-win strategy of much greater power than the fight over CAFE standards.

Conservation as a Parallel, Co-Equal Strategy with Production

At the same time we work to increase production of energy, we must work to find ways to increase energy conservation. There are a number of steps that can be taken.

Congressman Roy Blunt notes that we currently spend eight times more money on federal subsidies for low income heating than we spend on modernizing homes so they don't use as much energy.

A variety of tax credits should be developed to accelerate maximum efficiency in energy use and to accelerate the replacement of inefficient systems with more modern, more efficient systems.

The Choice is Ours

The time has come for Americans to demand a fundamental change in energy policy.

If we want less expensive gasoline, then we have to demand the policies that will increase the supply of oil and reduce its cost.

If we want a reliable energy policy that reduces our dependence on foreign dictatorships, then we have to demand greater use of American resources and American technology.

If we want these changes to come before we are blackmailed or bankrupted by foreign dictatorships, then we must demand that politicians cut through the red tape, change the bureaucracy, and get the job done.

And if our elected officials want to stick with the current scarcity-producing, high price-resulting energy policies, then its time to retire them for leaders who want more production at lower cost.

The choice is ours.

Your friend,

Newt Gingrich

P.S. -- Father's Day is just around the corner and there are great gift ideas available at great prices at Newt.org. Just click here to order personally signed copies of my new novel, Days of Infamy, as well as Pearl Harbor and Real Change. With the purchase of either of these three personally signed books, you can get a signed copy of Gettysburg for only $5. If you buy both a personalized copy of Pearl Harbor and Days of Infamy, you will receive a signed Gettysburg for free!

P.P.S. -- Callista and I had the pleasure of seeing Barry Manilow in concert this weekend. You can view pics taken by Callista here.




TagTag | Email Email | Print Print |
Comments
By Tusculum @ Monday, May 19, 2008 6:44 PM
Newt, as usual, in America we have ample resources, and a remarkable 200 year tradition of ingenuity to utilize them, if only government did not get in the way, but performed its legitimate function of oversight of all interested parties involved in its responsible development.

Whenever I see where government, or proposed legislation which your article reflects, becomes harmful to the people it is
chartered to serve, it reminds me of some telling quotes from the learned men of the past that sum up the issue succinctly.

In the issues of energy independence ( I personally heard Pres. Ford stress this) and a "Free Trade" policy that is a military security risk both by way of technology transfer, and national bankruptcy, we may find the people viewing their government as the source, or quite literally, a "curse" creating their pressing financial crises. This, the Founders would have regarded as fatal to the continuance of the Republic... quite a terrifying thought.

Please see a relevant quote from an old Harvard Alumni: Abiel Abbot, ( b. 1765; 1859.)

Abbot graduated at Harvard in 1787, taught in Phillips Andover academy until 1789, In 1794 he was tutor of Greek in Harvard. STD. 1838, Harvard.

Abbot, speaking to the Ancient and Honorable Artillery Company, of Boston, in 1802.

How to commit NATIONAL SUICIDE:

Quote:

“What then would that government deserve to have said of it, which should level the bulwarks of the country on every side; prepare an easy ingress and egress for every plunderer, who might be tempted by the defenceless state of the country to ravage it; demolish its forts on the land, and sink, or fell, or give to the worms its wooden walls by sea; disband its necessary troops; empty its treasury; and choke the grand channel of resource, its commerce; which should even seem to invite the citizens to bite and devour one another with impunity by barring the sacred doors of public justice, or by delivering the keys of them to dependent judges. This some might call State suicide.” Pg.[ 17 ]

(Please note the Artillery Company is still very much alive, and operates a Museum at Faneuil Hall, Boston. Noted past members include James Monroe, Chester Alan Arthur, Calvin Coolidge and John F. Kennedy.)

I have spent untold hours examining hundreds of works like Abbot's, and can assure everyone that his thinking was typical of the period.

Please re-read Abbot's quote, does anything sound familiar? Defenceless? Plunderer? Empty treasury? Choking of Commerce? Would anyone allow this to happen regularly to their home? Of course not. America is our "Home." Why let it happen at all?

The ideas you have defined here, are well within the scope and practice of those who designed and engineered our American Republic. May "good success" in their application be had, for "ourselves, and our posterity." Thanks Newt, we need more thinkers like you, now.

By John Ashman @ Monday, May 19, 2008 4:02 PM
http://www.americansolutions.com/SolutionsLab/Solution.aspx?Guid=84868135-2882-4931-acdb-064c7a2e61b0

By John Ashman @ Monday, May 19, 2008 3:30 PM
Where's the conservation part of the plan? Can't all be just 'more cheap energy'. Why are our vehicles generally half as efficient as those sold in Europe and Asia. Why are high efficiency vehicles not available in the US? Why can't I buy the high mileage vehicles for sale in other countries?

By WAnderson @ Sunday, May 18, 2008 7:56 PM
I couldn't agree more with RepublicanRyan and Thompson_bi. It seems as though the Republicans have simply rolled over and gave up, essentially fearful of getting into the face of the liberal media. How can we get "real solutions" out there when it seems as though the House and especially the Senate GOP have left their "manhood" at home. Why didin't they push to block the farmer subsidies and food stamp bill, thereby driving up taxes and food costs at the grocery line? Why didn't they marry alternative energy and support of the farmer's by incentivising the energy supplying industry to lease farmland borders for use as wind farms? Clean energy, no additional taxes, increased income to the U.S. farmers, and a black-eye for the Dems. Who could ask for more?

By Craig Startt @ Sunday, May 18, 2008 10:27 AM
Great ideas. Can anyone in DC read ? Another idea:
Add tax of $ 1.50 / gallon on gas and fund a 10 year Manhatten Project, run by private industry with incentive goals. At same time, eliminate the federal tax on diesel. The saving will show up in reduced food and other costs and lower inflation. Will also stimulate purchase of diesel cars. Pass a $ 3000 , 3 year tax credit on cars with 40 + MPG, for buyers, not makers.

By rbrose902 @ Sunday, May 18, 2008 12:16 AM
We need a new energy policy to be at the top of the list of a new contract with america. We need someone to lead us like Newt in the 90's. Second we need accountability in government spending. Why aren't people outraged with out of control government spending

By rte66vc @ Friday, May 16, 2008 10:40 PM
How do we convince McCain and others to follow wake up and follow suit?

By RepublicanRyan @ Friday, May 16, 2008 1:18 PM
I am with you Newt, the republicans and media are allowing the dems to get away with their rants about global warming and complain about high gas prices when they have advocated high gas prices for years through higer taxes and over regulation. Step one is the to hold the dems accountable then present our counter argument of pro growth pro innovation vision energy policy that will lead to energy independence as well as another technical revolution having a positive impact on our economy through more investment inside the U.S. and allow for a huge export market for new technologies.

By thompson_bi@msn.com @ Friday, May 16, 2008 11:00 AM
Newt,

This might seem like heresy but I haven’t seen any real republican leadership in congress since you left DC. Maybe we need to wash out the current Republican dead wood and hopefully replace them with some real movers and shakers and visionaries in a couple more years.

A couple of months ago I had an opportunity to ask Senator Martinez from Florida about republican organization and leadership in DC. I basically said it appeared to me that the house was going one direction, the senate another and the Whitehouse still another and as a result nothing significant was being accomplished.

The Senator didn’t answer as he was quickly exiting the room but his chief of staff commented “boy do you have that right!”

The majority is gone but when they were there, there was no leadership. I likened the Republicans in DC to the Key Stone Cops.

You were my choice for President and when you decided not to run, I think it was a tragic day for the nation.

Like most of the nation, I want change but it is in the opposite direction of Hillary and Obama. Bill

By tshamm @ Friday, May 16, 2008 12:41 AM
Mr. Gingrich,
I watch you on Hannity & Colmes whenever you visit their show and you are more intellectual and make more sense than any guest I see on all of the news channels. I wish you would have had time to get a campaign situated before this next election, but I sincerely hope you run in 2012. I have been a life-long republican and I am leaning towards Obama this time just because of the potential of change. It may be bad change, but we are all ready for something different. I don't see how the republican party can win the election with the state of our nation at present, even if it's only partially Bush's fault. We need your "real Change" ideas to influence our nation and regain our strength and respect globally that we once had. China scares me to death and what they are accomplishing in their country is st the cost of our economy. Please push our party for what this country needs even if McCain can't be persuaded to do what is right.

By 20garden @ Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:02 PM
All of these suggestions are wonderful and seem to be quite logical but that is the main problem they're all just to logical. If these were more abstract and very confusing than they would have a much better chance of passing the Congress. Everything it seems logical doesn't pass and all of the off the wall ridiculous concepts seemed to get past. Maybe the easiest way is all conservative republicans join the democratic party and boot all the liberal nuts out of office. If all of these proposals were by democrats every one of them would be passed and the liberal media would be tickled to death to promote them because they were proposed by democrats. But as much bias in the media for democratic ideology it is amazing to me that there are any republicans holding any political offices other than maybe a dog catcher. I mean it seems a little difficult to get the message out when the messenger won't even listen because your logo is an elephant and not a jack ass.

By big-dog @ Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:54 PM
Great ideas, and hope we would focus on those achieveable in the current political climate first. Technological breakthrough is key...coal and oil solutions should be "short term" only. Nuclear is viable for the next 20 years, and can get built and permitted a lot quicker is the bureacracy in DC is retired and we open up Yucca Mountain for long term storage of spent fuel. I particularly like the idea of firing half of the DOE and incentivizing technological breakthrough with the savings!

By For_The_Gipper @ Thursday, May 15, 2008 4:42 AM
Great ideas Newt. You know what excatly is the lefts plan for energy anyhow? The GOP is arguing a better position. The GOP really really needs to have bold solutions. as much as I am glad as my state of Georgia is still solidly Republican, but the congressional losses are terrrifying.

Now it may help us long term as a loss would give conservatives something to rally for. I also wonder if the GOP should argue middle class issues?

I admit this democratic congress has been horrible but the President always gets the blame fairly or unfairly.

As a side note I hope Republicans remeber the 11th commmandent and not blame fellow republicans, we are better than that.

By GoreBull Warming @ Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:34 PM
Newt, I like you’re your list of 10. I think where the Republican leadership has failed the American people is in not demanding a real debate on Gorebull Warming. As far as I can tell only one debate has occurred and the Gorebull Warming people lost big time. And it was even hosted by NPR!! I can blame people for falling for the alarmist trap, because we are inundated daily by the media from everything to Beer to Polar Bears be impacted by so called Gorebull Warming.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9082151

By John Ansell @ Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:22 PM
Newt, I saw that the Polar Bear was placed on the endangered list today. Do you know how I go about getting "True Conservatives" placed on that list? This Gullible Warming junk science is getting out of hand.

Your plans are solid, but please stop giving Gore credibility. That's pretty please with sugar on top!!!!

I'm serious about finding out how to add "real conservatives" to the endangered list!!! How do I do that?

By ericrobinson @ Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:14 PM
Which man sounds more like a "President"? Barrack? Hillary? Bob? Ron? John? Newt? Just think what kind of set-back 4 or 8 more years of stupidity in the White House will be, and how long it will take the American people to achieve what they need to achieve, because the American people will end up picking the wrong person to [not] lead them forward. Thanks, Newt!

By saraad @ Wednesday, May 14, 2008 12:16 PM
Newt and All --

ALL alternatives sounds good but isn't GREAT. Positive change would be to promote one or two of the very best alternatives based on expected FULL cost per kilowatt. Wind is a potential looser due to inconsistancy, capital cost, and ugly site. Corn and soybeans are near loosers -- FARM and CONVERSION subsudies by politicians will be vast, total production has a max output of about 7-percent of our needs with drasticly higher food prices.

Coal has potential but Americans don't care for soot nor bald mountains.

Nuclea Energy is a must and far out strips any alternative with its potential and long term cost effectiveness.

Conclusion -- alternatives have varying degrees of productivity and can't be lumped together.


By Anonymous @ Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:02 AM
Newt:

All of your ideas have longer term merit, but even if everything you suggest was implemented immediately, it would not materially reduce the USA's oil consumption for many years. The inescapable fact is that imported oil will be the indespensable life blood of the American economy for at least a generation because there are no cost effective substitutes of sufficient magnitude to materially reduce the 13 million barrels of oil that America imports every day.

The North American oil basin is largely depleted after 100 years of heavy production and the average life of North America's proven oil reserves at current production rates is only about 11 years so our foreign oil dependence is growing rapidly. There are no huge new oil reserves to be found in North America, and even if you managed to find enough oil supply in the America's to fill the USA's needs, the price of oil would still be set on the global market and oil rices would remain a huge threat to the American economy. This will especially be the case if Americans are foolish enough to elect Democrats in November that are eager to abandon Iraq and the Middle East to chaos that would cause oil prices to skyrocket from their already high levels that are crippling the American economy.

Transportation fired by nuclear powered electricity is the longer term energy solution, but it takes over a decade and huge capital investments to build nuclear plants and the transportation vehicles and infrastructure systems. Coal fired electricity is a partial interim solution, but plants take years to build and the Democrats will continue to kill coal projects for spurious environmental reasons.

The short term solutions to the oil problem are as follows:

1) Eradicate the stigma attached to oil and the myths of energy independence by educating American voters about the reality of our oil dependence.

2) Oil prices would skyrocket if the USA abandons Iraq to chaos so educate voters about the effect of a withdrawal from Iraq on oil prices and their personal financial well being. This would require strong political leadership that is missing, but if accomplished this should cause the poll numbers on Iraq to shift in favor of staying in Iraq for as long as it takes to defend our vital strategic interests. Almost unbelievably, not one politician in Washington is talking about the oil price explosion that would occur if the USA abandons Iraq to chaos that threatens its oil exports that make up most of the differential between the 85 million barrels per day of gobal oil supply and the 82 million barrels per day of global oil demand.

3) Congress should pass a resolution with a strong majority that unequivocally states that America will remain in Iraq to help that nation recover, to help the Iraqis reach their oil production potential, to defeat our terrorist enemies and to defend our vital economic interests no matter how long it takes.

4) Congress should invest at least $50 billion per year in helping the Iraqis rapidly increase their oil production from 2.5 million barrels of oil per day to their 8 to 10 million barrels per day potential. At $125 per barrel, America is spending $500 billion more for oil each year than they were when "white flag" Harry Reid declared that Iraq was lost on 4/19/07. Therefore, $50 billion per year to significantly increase global oil supply would a great investment for American consumers. Oil prices would only have to fall by $7 per barrel on average to recoup the $50 billion, and oil prices would fall by many multiples of $7 if the USA helps the Iraqis reach their production potential.

5) Congress should dramatically increase the incentives to rapidly build new nuclear and clean coal fired power plants and to incent a shift to electric fueled transportation.

6) Congress should incent consumers to decrease their energy consumption by 20%.

7) Congress should adequately fund initiatives to create viable new energy sources.

All of the above measures would:

1) Send a strong message of resolve to the oil markets that should drive down the price of oil, and therby trigger an economic boom.

2) Encourage speculative financial investors to leave the oil markets.

3) Dishearten Al Qaeda's leaders who are eagerly awaiting a USA departure from Iraq and deprive their investors of funds and rationale to continue their investments in terror.

4) Deprive the tyrannical regimes in Russia, Venezuela and Iran of huge amounts of cash flow they need to maintain their regimes and persist in their antagonism toward the USA.

Perhaps more significantly, the failure to adopt these measures will very likely produce an ever increasing oil price that will severely retard economic growth, and could produce an oil price driven global economic catastrophe if the USA abandons Iraq and the Middle East to domination by America's worst enemies.

Please visit www.politicalrealityonline.com for the supporting facts and analysis on these assertions as well as compelling insights that expose the folly of the Democrat's demagoguery on all the major issues of 2008. These concepts could spawn a Republican landslide in November if the Republicans would incorporate them into their political message.

By Tillie @ Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:04 AM
Inflation on food is a growing concern caused in part by ethonal. The DEMOCRATIC controlled congress is escaping the BLAME and blaming Bush. People need to focus more on what the REID-Pelosi congress is creating and getting these guys OUT of office. NOW.

By JoeHol @ Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:32 PM
I believe it is important for Republicans to come out with bold solutions now! With the public having such a negative view of the Republican party it is important that they present their solutions now so they have enough time to explain to the public why their solutions are best. If not we are going to be stuck with the cap and trade junk.

By Tillie @ Tuesday, May 13, 2008 7:41 PM
Newt,
We need your leadership; you have to kick Republicans in the butt or they will be out of office.

By Tillie @ Tuesday, May 13, 2008 7:39 PM
Newt,
Now this is a great article--I have sent it everywhere. But we need to speak to McCain who just supported the cap/tax and trade bill-UGH.
I will push DURBIN and Obama to do something for IL coal--Ha! Obama is too busy being a candidate.
And Durbin--he is the one who called our troops HILTER troops.

By csharpdev @ Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:14 PM
Great ideas Newt...

Suzy, Newt can't do it alone you need to contact your senator and house rep.

By rroll4 @ Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:32 PM
Newt,

Where do our legislators stand on energy? Where can we find their energy grade? We need to know if we should re-elect our policymakers or find new ones.

By Suzy @ Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:23 PM
Great Energy Plans, now we need you and those in charge to enact it. Please work hard to see that this is done. Thanks.

Click Here to post a comment

About Newt

Contact

Internships

FAQ's

Terms of Use

 
Powered By: Powered By iBelong Networks
spacer