spacer
 HOME |  MY NEWT.ORG | AMERICAN SOLUTIONS | CHT | PARA LATINOS |
Reagan Two Speeches Evil Empire
Recommended Sites
GOP must relearn Reagan principles
Washington Times
May 20, 2009
By Newt GingrichReagan Thatcher

There has been a flurry of controversy about whether Ronald Reagan is relevant to Republicans and conservatives in 2009.

Some people have made the legitimate point that you cannot copy or imitate the solutions of 1981 for 2009's challenges.

While imitation or direct copying a generation later will not work, learning the core principles of Mr. Reagan and learning the lessons of history is essential.

The heart of conservatism ought to be a deep respect for the past and a willingness to think profoundly about how great leaders have met challenges and solved problems in their era.

Because of our deep respect and affection for Mr. Reagan, Callista and I joined with Dave Bossie and Citizens United to make a film, "Ronald Reagan: Rendezvous with Destiny."

That 90-minute documentary reminds us of the charismatic power and extraordinary educational capabilities Mr. Reagan brought to the presidency. The film also has a brief segment that reminds us of the weakness and destructiveness of the left during the Carter presidency.

There are some similarities to the 1977 world in which Jimmy Carter entered office with great popularity (actually more popular than President Obama on Inauguration Day). President Carter followed left-wing policies of increased government spending, government controls of the economy and weakness abroad.

By 1980, these policies of the left had created a disaster. There was 13 percent inflation, 22 percent interest rates, gasoline rationing (Americans were only able to get gasoline every other day based on the last digit of your license plate) and weakness abroad, leading to aggressive Soviet adventurism and a 444-day Iranian hostage crisis.

Under Mr. Carter, America became a mess. And what was his answer to the mess? Mr. Carter gave a national speech telling us to lower our expectations and accept a limited future of malaise as the best we could do. We were told to accept our mediocre fate.

The American people preferred to reject both malaise and Mr. Carter. They elected Mr. Reagan in a landslide and gave him a Republican Senate and a 33-seat increase in the House of Representatives.

The rest was history.

However, the longer I study this period the more convinced I am that while we have much to learn from Mr. Reagan, the lessons of that era are inadequate to the coming crisis.

It is now obvious that despite the great achievements of the Reagan revolution and the Contract with America, there was a strategic failure to root out the left and the special interests of the left.

The result is that 29 years after Mr. Reagan's great victory, the left is stronger in academe, the news media, the courts, the bureaucracies, the interest groups and their lobbyists.

Sacramento, Calif.; Albany, N.Y.; and Trenton, N.J., are sicker today than they were in 1980. The city of Detroit is sicker today than it was in 1980. The willingness of judges to be overtly anti-religious and to imitate foreign courts is greater. The academic world has metastasized so that anti-American leftists and terrorist-group members like William Ayers can get 3,000 professors to sign a letter endorsing them.

The Obama administration has appointed five attorneys whose law firms were pro bono representatives of alleged terrorists. Defending terrorists is in vogue. Defending America is irrelevant.

In this world, essential lessons must also be learned by studying Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. I strongly recommend "There Is No Alternative: Why Margaret Thatcher Matters," by Claire Berlinski as a starting point.

Mrs. Thatcher clearly understood that the great threat of socialism was moral and not economic. Socialism is bad because it destroys freedom. It destroys self-reliance, destroys individual initiative, and transfers power from the citizen to the politician and the bureaucrat.

Every American who wants to know how dangerous it is for the government to have such enormous influence over AIG, Citibank, Chrysler, etc. should read Ms. Berlinski's study of Mrs. Thatcher.

The evils of socialism and the virtues of freedom will be the central choice for Americans in 2010 and 2012, and Mrs. Thatcher will be our tutor in that argument.

We need Reaganesque optimism and Thatcherite intellectual clarity to defeat socialism and uproot it from the institutions it now controls.

• Newt Gingrich is a former speaker of the House and chairman of American Solutions.



TagTag | Email Email | Print Print |
Comments
By napoleonhhh @ Sunday, May 31, 2009 12:06 PM
Newt is defending free market capitalism by holding it responsible for democracy. He is condemning socialism by holding it responsible for totalitarianism. This is similar to comparing apples to oranges: the economic apples of capitalism and socialism with the political oranges of democracy and totalitarianism. This is sophistry. He attempts to persuade the reader to reject socialism NOT by comparing it to capitalism, BUT by bringing democracy and totalitarianism into the argument and assuming that all capitalist countries are democratic and all socialist countries are totalitarian. This doesn't make sense. We all know that both democratic-capitalist countries and totalitarian-capitalist countries exist and have existed in the past. We also know that both democratic-socialist countries and totalitarian-socialist countries exist and have existed in the past. But the reality is that most democratic countries are a combination of both socialism and capitalism: Socialism in health-care, education, transportation, and basic necessities. Capitalism in consumer goods, luxury items, and various other services. Many countries offer citizens both private and public sector options in many of these categories. Nevertheless, the point is not the degree to which any of these democratic societies are capitalistic or socialistic, but that they are all democratic.

By twleonard @ Monday, May 25, 2009 10:14 AM
Check out the Constitution Party!!!

www.constitutionparty.org

By nancy512 @ Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:54 AM
Karl Rove’s wsj article today points out how this president’s campaigning is one thing and governing is another. When you are a guided by a desire for power without principles flip flopping is the predictable behavior. By contrast, if Republicans base their approach and solutions on the winning principles of Reagan and Thatcher there will never be a need to flip flop or mislead. Newt is right, this country has never seen the degree to which we are being taken down the road to socialism. When the time comes to correct course it will require a clear vision. Reagan and Thatcher principles will ring true to anyone who wishes to live in freedom.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124286200693341141.html

By dajeeps @ Thursday, May 21, 2009 3:47 AM
We don't need just Reagan optimism, we need his principles. Our liberty and rights come from our creator, and Reagan understood this. Government is to follow after the people, not the other way around. This principle is as timeless as the wisdom of the founders that embodied it into our constitution. As soon as Republicans realize this and stop following after liberals, giving us socialism-lite dressed up in free market clothes, they can and will come back.

It would be nice to have a real leader for the RNC that recognizes this and speaks with such passion about it as Reagan did, not one who sounds like he doesn't' even really believe what he's saying.

By Digital Jeffersonian @ Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:43 PM
We as Republicans who love our Constitution need to take advantage of the recent ballot defeats in California. This shows that the people do not want big government and higher taxes. How wrong supposed Republican Collin Powell is and how right Rush Limbaugh is. We need to focus on Reagan's messages.

By Digital Jeffersonian @ Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:42 PM
We as Republicans who love our Constitution need to take advantage of the recent ballot defeats in California. This shows that the people do not want big government and higher taxes. How wrong supposed Republican Collin Powell is and how right Rush Limbaugh is. We need to focus on Reagan's messages.

By ericrobinson @ Wednesday, May 20, 2009 2:28 PM
I hope I get a job in time to be able to contribute to Newt '10.

Click Here to post a comment

About Newt

Contact

Internships

FAQ's

Terms of Use

 
Powered By: Powered By iBelong Networks
spacer