spacer
 HOME |  MY NEWT.ORG | AMERICAN SOLUTIONS | CHT | PARA LATINOS |
A Rising Anti-Government Tide
The Washington Post
Friday, May 22, 2009
By Newt Gingrich

Americans should look carefully at the anti-politician, anti-government mood exhibited in California this week. Just as Proposition 13 and the anti-tax movement of 1978 were the forerunners of the Reagan presidential victory, so the results of Tuesday's vote are a harbinger of things to come.

The repudiation of the California establishment in the series of initiative defeats could hardly have been more decisive. Five taxing and spending measures were rejected by 62.6 to 66.4 percent of the voters. That is a consistent majority of enormous potential. An even larger majority, 73.9 percent, approved the proposition limiting elected officials' salaries when there is a deficit.

This vote is the second great signal that the American people are getting fed up with corrupt politicians, arrogant bureaucrats, greedy interests and incompetent, destructive government.

The elites ridiculed or ignored the first harbinger of rebellion, the recent tea parties. While it will be harder to ignore this massive anti-tax, anti-spending vote, they will attempt to do just that.

Voters in our largest state spoke unambiguously, but politicians and lobbyists in Sacramento are ignoring or rejecting the voters' will, just as they are in Albany and Trenton. The states with huge government machines have basically moved beyond the control of the people. They have become castles of corruption, favoritism and wastefulness. These state governments are run by lobbyists for the various unions through bureaucracies seeking to impose the values of a militant left. Elections have become so rigged by big money and clever incumbents that the process of self-government is threatened.

Sacramento politicians will now reject the voters' call for lower taxes and less spending and embrace the union-lobbyist-bureaucrat machine that is running California into the ground, crippling its economy and cheating residents. This model of high-tax, big-spending inefficiency has already driven thousands of successful Californians out of the state (taking with them an estimated $11 billion in annual tax revenue). The exodus will continue.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is a smart, tough, charismatic leader who has been forced to submit to policies he knows are ruining California on behalf of interests he knows are cheating the state. His failure to tame the union-lobbyist-bureaucrat machine that owns the legislature is a symptom of just how powerful it is.

Albany is even more corrupt and dysfunctional. The special interests that own the legislators in both parties have been exploiting New York for two generations. They have impoverished the Upstate region to the point where it is a vast zone of no jobs and no opportunities. Their predatory tax and bureaucratic union behavior is beginning to cripple New York City. More and more successful New Yorkers are leaving the state. In the face of multiple crises, Gov. David Paterson has shown himself incapable of carrying out reform.

In other words, the political machines in California and New York are wrecking the states' economies and driving out successful residents. But the machines don't care because all they want to do is own the wreckage.

This system of ruining communities on behalf of interest groups first appeared in Detroit. Bad government, bad politicians and bad policies drove a city that had, in 1950, the highest per capita income of any large American city to No. 62 in per capita income as of 2007. The population has declined from 1.8 million to fewer than 950,000. Recently, 1,800 homes were sold for under $10,000 each. The human cost of bad politics and bad government in Detroit is staggering.

Now President Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid want to impose on the nation this style of politics in which interest groups, politicians and bureaucracies dominate. Look at their record: a $787 billion stimulus no elected official had read, 8,000 earmarks, an Environmental Protection Agency plan to control the economy through carbon regulations, the government threatening retaliation against those who would protect their property rights against theft in the Chrysler bailout -- again and again, this team is moving toward a government that owns the country rather than a government that is owned by the people.

Watch Sacramento politicians and interest groups work to overrule the people of California. Watch Albany politicians and interest groups continue to undermine the economy of New York. Watch the arrogance of the elites in Washington as they impose their costs and special deals on the American people.

Then look again at the 62 percent-plus majority in California in favor of smaller government and lower taxes.

In the great tradition of political movements rising against arrogant, corrupt elites, there will soon be a party of people rooting out the party of government. This party may be Republican; it may be Democratic; in some states it may be a third party. The politicians have been warned.

The writer, a Republican, was speaker of the House of Representatives from 1995 to 1999. He is chairman of the Gingrich Group, a communications and consulting firm, and general chairman of American Solutions for Winning the Future.



TagTag | Email Email | Print Print |
Comments
By Carmen86 @ Saturday, June 06, 2009 2:05 AM
How do you feel about term limits?

By lonniebutler @ Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:58 PM
Date: Friday 5/29/09
Re: Editorial in SJ Mercury News 5/24/09

Dear Mr. Gingrich,
I read your piece in the SJ Mercury News last Sunday. I (and my wife) are among the nearly two-third of California voters who rejected the propositions in the special election.
I admire your political acumen and I regard you, much more than anyone else, as the principal engineer and architect of the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress. And you may well be right about the election, especially Proposition 1F which passed with nearly three-fourths voter approval to freeze legislator salaries.
But my vote was in rejection of the February 2009 budget deal, which was patched together in obstruction. Proposition 1A would have extended three regressive tax measures for another two years, Proposition 1C would have anointed the lottery as a central bank, and Propositions ID and E would have plumbed a permanent suction valve to voter-mandated funds for childhood development and mental health services.
I purposely did not vote yes or no on 1F. I left it blank. Why? I regarded it as irrelevant to the budget crisis. It was easily the most comprehensible of all the measures but I feel it was an expedient to divert and ventilate the anger and frustration among the voters. My sensibility is that politicians don’t care a whit about their salaries. It is the associations made while encircled within the Sacramento power structure that make their later lives so lucrative and rewarding.
I don’t believe a majority of California voters believe that the gutting of government services and balancing the budget solely on cuts in spending and reduction in taxes is a good thing. To the contrary, they have approved measures that would tax themselves and protect funding for K-12 education, childhood development and mental health services. I think a great deal of the rejection was based in anger over the uncompromising obstruction by the Republicans. While you may see this as a harbinger and basis for a an anti-tax, smaller government mass political resurgence with parallels to 1978 I see it as another incremental nudge in the demographic shift from a white majority population in 2009 toward a white plurality in 2049 and part of that is toward establishing majority rule in the California legislature. The polling shows the majority of Californians would accept increased taxes, if they were fair, and if they were truly dedicated to protect education, health services, and improving infrastructure
I think you are wisely looking at this at a distance from the flat-line base of the Republican party. They really have nowhere else to go but to solidify white identity with wedge issues. And demographically speaking that is really nowhere to go.




Respectfully
Lonnie Butler

By GringoBob @ Monday, June 01, 2009 9:09 AM
Mr Speaker,

I have never voted for you as I am not a resident of Georgia and you have not run for any National Office - YET, but I always admired and respected your work as the Speaker and hope there is a common ground on which I can support your candidacy for the highest office in this land, if this be your decision -

I wholeheartly agree with those who say you are the smartest guy in the room and you certainly have the articulation skills needed to marginalize lying Community Organizers like Obama, but we are still apart on one or two major issues -

In your 12 American Solutions, you state "Restoring fiscal sanity and accountability to Washington also means eliminating wasteful pork-barrel spending. The budget process must be both honest and transparent, and spending should never be a result of insider connections in Washington", and this makes sense - however, we are now into a more serious and dangerous situation and we need leadership that will firmly, and fairly, reduce the Federal Budget and reduce the spending in a very significant way by immediately repealing ALL of the onerous taxes and spending introduced by GW Bush in his second term and Obama in his tenure to date - REDUCE and REPEAL back to the level of the 2003 Budget - as a minimum - and begin reducing the size of Government by a minimum of 10% per year from that point.

This approach will give us back the means to pay the huge national debt that Bush and Obama have put on our great-grandchildren's backs.

The second area that we seem to be not quite together is allowing the status quo of "progressive" Republicans - I don't completely understand your tolerance with this portion of the RNC as the progressives like Colin Powell who think Americans WANT to pay more taxes and have bigger Government, which is, of course, counterproductive to the Constitution and the free enterprise system - It is possible that I have missed something here, so please clarify for me.

A few days ago, I asked on this forum if there was any way you could consider switching over to the Independent or Libertarian Party, and I DO understand that the Republican is a hugely larger base than that approach but also (recently) tends to want to be more the the D's than the R's American people supported for all those years - this is why the "progressive" issue is so important, at least so in my mind.

The single largest and most powerful political lobby in Washington DC today is our nations lawyers.... who lead the way with $101 540 000 annual investment in political corruption - 73% of it is invested in Democrats

#2 would have to be the labor unions, which combined, invest over $47 805 860 annually and give 90% of that money to Democrats.

Through their labor union, 1.4 million government (taxpayer funded) employees are now the biggest single union lobby organization in America, giving an astounding $4 069 063 annually or 8.5% of total Union contributions, and yes - 98% of it to Democrats

59.9 million folks DID NOT vote for Obama - if each would contribute $100 to a National Fund, that would amass $59 Billion and give us an amazing 500:1 advantage over the highest lobby of the lawyers and we can end the corruption for once and all - assuming that only 10% of those 59.9 million folks will actually get involved, that would still give us a $5.9 Billion war chest and a 50:1 investment advantage - I, for one, will be pleased to make this kind of investment in the Country and Constitution that we love and want to see remain in place.

$5.9 Billion should be adequate for us to completely change the House of Representatives and at least 1/3 of the Senate as well as determine who will be the next President and Vice-President of these United States - let's do it !!! - lets start with replacing ALL of the "progressive" House members in the 2010 Elections -

respectfully submitted,


GringoBob

"an old retired guy living in Costa Rica, 'cause after I gave everything to Bush, there was nothing left to give to Obama and his punishment is to not allow anyone on pension income to survive in America - it's not too bad here, and soon, you will be living in a Banana Republic too"


By Hot @ Monday, June 01, 2009 9:05 AM
Question?

Would you consider a person that only made 20 to 28 thousand a year from his/her private owned business and HIRED three employees a RICH PERSON?
Know of several examples.
Some of those that get help from the government have it better.

You bucket holds no water.

Obama is making the rich richer and the poor poorer.
Example: Government Motors.

As Bill Clinton would say, what is the definition of rich?


You elected these people SO YOU MUST BE HAPPY.

By Reaganite Republican Resistance @ Sunday, May 31, 2009 7:09 PM
RIGHT-On Newt- great piece.

1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.

5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.

10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.

All I know is... I never got a job from a poor person-

IMO, after all Obama's pork-n-welfare fails to create any real economic growth, but ignites vicious inflation instead, the Democrats face a bloodbath in 2010- seems you are on to something here with the developments in California.

http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/

By Hot @ Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:56 AM
Oh NO, we should use diplomacy on those democrats. BHO would want it no other way.
And look how well diplomacy has worked on Iran and Korea.

That's it, DIPLOMACY for the democrats.
In short WATERBOARD the bunch of them and leave the water runninng.



You elected these people SO YOU MUST BE HAPPY.

By nancy512 @ Tuesday, May 26, 2009 7:51 PM
holman, are you saying we should try to convert democrats against their wills out of being socialists and back into being basic liberals?

By holman @ Tuesday, May 26, 2009 6:18 PM
As the career Schactmanite and founding father of neoconservatism Irving Kristol remarked: "Viewed in this way, one can say that the historical task and political purpose of neoconservatism would seem to be this: to convert the Republican party, and American conservatism in general, against their respective wills, into a new kind of conservative politics suitable to governing a modern democracy."

This is what conservatives should do to the Democrats.

By GringoBob @ Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:41 AM
don't agree Holman - the present problem is liberals v conservatives, the root evil is progressives - whether they be R's or D's, they are destroying America

http://Group912.org

By wendylumm @ Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:35 AM
I forgot to mention all those copies are either checked out or have a long wait list! Good luck getting hold of one!

By wendylumm @ Tuesday, May 26, 2009 9:34 AM
I think it's a good, significant sign that 2 major counties near me in Atlanta have nearly 100 copies of Mark Levin's Liberty or Tyranny, One Second After, and Amity Shlaes' The Forgotten Man. Is this a sign of conservatism gaining momentum in this country? Hey-I used to be a democrat!

By holman @ Monday, May 25, 2009 10:06 PM
It would be easier for conservatives to capture the Democrat leadership and party than attempt to retake the Republican Party.

I'm serious.

The Liberal wing of the Dem Party has destroyed itself, and is ripe for conservative Democrats to take over.

The Republican Party, on the other hand, is tightly controlled by the neoconservatives and the Christian Right. They will stick with total support of Israel, religion in government, and the anti-abortion stance. These social positions block the use of responsible government (balanced budget, no earmarks, abandonment of the bail-outs) and national security concerns as a means to regain political domination in America.

Leave the social issues alone and stay with the fiscal and security responsibilities, and then we could eject the Pelosis, Reids, and Franks of that party - and it would be quick, starting in 2010.

Forget the Republicans. Their new dogma has no street cred.

By twleonard @ Monday, May 25, 2009 10:01 AM
Check out the "Constitution Party"!!!
constitutionparty.org

By GringoBob @ Sunday, May 24, 2009 9:03 AM
here is what we believe is the intelligent solution to the massive spending by progressives - R's and D's

http://Group912.org/takeback.html

By JR1985 @ Saturday, May 23, 2009 6:52 PM
What is different? Why won't it work now? What water has been lost forever? What bridges have been burned that can't be repaired? How does the passage of time change the concepts in the constitution?

It is more applicable now than ever before. It is the most JUST document ever produced. You should read it.

By Hot @ Saturday, May 23, 2009 3:40 PM
Tell me do you people live by Ben, Albert and Ron politics? If you do you have a problem.
This is not 1800 or 1900. Things are different and what worked 50 to 100 years ago won't work now because there have been to much water under the bridge and too may bridges have been burnt.

I see where HBO is coming from trying something new but he too is living a dream that will not work.

People have to learn to take responsibility, apply the laws JUST FOR EVERYONE and to be held accountable or this country is doomed.

And you Newt fans out there, Newt isn't the one at this time to raise America from the ashes.

You elected these people SO YOU MUST BE HAPPY.

By JR1985 @ Saturday, May 23, 2009 3:10 PM
Benjamin Franklin said after the constitutional convention if the public is ever able to vote itself money from the Public Treasury, this Republic shall have reached its end.

That is the basic problem that put us on this road to hell.

For all the talk of lobbiest, partisan politics, and corporate wealfare, we are now a country where instead of “ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can for your country”. We are now a nation where far to many vote based on what amount of what someone else earned are you going to give to me.

A business man, a lobbiest or someone paying the lobbiest can only vote once. And they do not have any real control over how their employees vote. But the folks voting themselves money, quite a large self interested group. One final thought. If we bankrupt the country, who will “take care of the poor” then?

By rbett @ Saturday, May 23, 2009 12:07 PM
Albert Einstein once wrote that an empty stomach is a poor political advisor.

I'm not certain how we manage government finance to avoid emergencies like that happening in California right now. But, it's clear partisan politics is the a clearer root to the crisis than any one funding stream, politician, or party.

By JR1985 @ Saturday, May 23, 2009 5:12 AM
No ! You are not wrong. The contract with America was brilliant. The country needs something like it now. If we the people do not take the governments credit card away we are to blame. We MUST stop this insane spending. You say you vote for the lesser of two evils. Okay how about this platform.

Every politician who voted for the stimulus package, the budget that is bigger than all the previous administrations combined, or voted for a bill they did not read should be voted out regardless of party.
Tell every one you know. Do your own “community organizing”. It is a winner. All but the most hard core leftist are insulted by speed reading bills and such INSANE spending.

Do this and I assure you politicians WILL get the message.

By DeaconCNY @ Friday, May 22, 2009 7:59 PM
Are you just waking up to the fact that voters just don't trust politicians, any politician. Yes Mr. Speaker, that would include you. I think you are an intelligent, articulate, well learned scholar of politics and history. But if you feel the "average American" has been taken in, from the days of "contract with America" well you are just wrong.
There was pork when you were speaker, and there has been little relief since. Many of us voters see this, but there is nothing we can do about it. Frankly my votes for many years has been for the "lesser of two evils". The players may change, but the game is the same, and American Taxpayers are the ultimate loosers.

By sassedbygov @ Friday, May 22, 2009 7:33 PM
I can't wait for the federalis to bail out all these far left unionized thieving states using my tax dollars. Oh joy!

I do believe it is the governments intent to ensure we all end up on the dole, as they are making it impossible to earn a living. Great Britain is the model for America's future.

Obama could have solved this economic crisis with a few sentences on inauguration day. "As of June 1st, 2009, all Federal taxes will convert to a flat 10% on income, capital gains, and business. No deductions, no subsidies, no bailouts."

The tidal wave of economic growth would have really been something to witness.

Instead, they've ransomed our prosperity into slavery. The fall of Rome was inevitable.

By egbegb @ Friday, May 22, 2009 5:50 PM
California polls showed that the measures would go down be a large margin. I suspect the 23% are very closely representative of people (Dems and Repubs) who are fed up with increased taxes with no substantitive improvement in California.

By claymonster @ Friday, May 22, 2009 5:36 PM
to pragmatist:
I believe you meant to say "...by UNDERestimating the intelligece..."
and I believe that quote is attributed to H.L. Mencken, not P.T. Barnum...

By Hot @ Friday, May 22, 2009 4:17 PM
California should fall off into the ocean.
Those people out there deserve all the hurt that can be put on them for electing people like Diana Feinstein and Nancy Pelosi.

Only reason 23% voted was probably the other 77% was high on drugs or busy marrying the same sex.


You elected these people SO YOU MUST BE HAPPY.

By Unimpressed Pragmatist @ Friday, May 22, 2009 1:24 PM
Don't read too much into the results of this election. Only 23% of registered voters voted despite the fact that these propositions were patently stupid and draconian tax increases were part of the package. The best that can be taken from this is that the 23% of the voters that know what they are doing voted and the 77% of Democrat ideologues stayed home.

Unfortunately, the average CA voter and taxpayer is all mouth and very little action. They have been, willingly, brainwashed into believing that Democrats know what they are doing and offer the best type of government available. There is no concept of independent thought among the majority of voters and taxpayers of the Golden Goose State. For proof of this note that 55% of them bought the Obama empty promise of hope and change that offered no details or substantiation. As PT Barnum was reputed to have said: "NO ONE EVER WENT BROKE OVERESTIMATING THE INTELLIGENCE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE". In this instance, the California voter.

If, as some are now pushing, the legislature is recalled, most of them would, then, be re-elected. Here in CA, it is always the other guy’s representatives who are corrupt and inept; never mine.

Click Here to post a comment

About Newt

Contact

Internships

FAQ's

Terms of Use

 
Powered By: Powered By iBelong Networks
spacer