spacer
 HOME |  MY NEWT.ORG | AMERICAN SOLUTIONS | CHT |
On The Road
   I’ve always wanted to title an essay like that, “On the Road.”   Living in North Carolina I was always an admirer of Charles Kuralt.   
 
    As I write this Newt and I are running around NYC promoting the launch of “Days of Infamy.”    It can get hectic, even a bit intimidating when you walk into a book store and four hundred people are lined up for copies.   Newt might be use to it, but as a writer I am a bit more of a recluse.   Another thing, of so many, that I admire about Newt is that he is inexhaustible.     Regardless if it takes an hour, or three hours, there is a kind word for every person, and whenever we spot an elderly vet in the crowd, a proud gentleman wearing a baseball cap emblazoned with “Big Red One,” or “Pearl Harbor,” there is an exchange of looks between us, an extra moment to shake a hand, to offer thanks.    Newt and I just write about those days,  the man we are shaking hands with, lived it, endured it, and gave us the freedom to gather peacefully, sixty five years later.    It is always a touching moment for us.
 
   I always have a few butterflies in my stomach on launch week for a book.    Is it really up to the best we could have done?   Given that we are writing about events within living memory of many Americans, do we do it justice an honor?  I hope readers, especially the vets, give us a thumbs up on this one.
 
   Last year, while on signing tour in Hawaii, we wrapped things up on the morning of Memorial Day.    I took my daughter Meghan, one of my closest buddies “WEB Griffin Jr.”  (Bill Butterworth IV) and we went to the Punch Bowl,  often referred to as the Arlington of the Pacific, where nearly 25,000 of our finest sleep the eternal sleep.    What a moment that takes your breath away as you drive in through the entry way to the sunken cone of an extinct volcano and there are twenty five thousand graves, each marked for that special day with a small American flag and as is the tradition in Hawaii, a garland of flowers.    Not ashamed to admit that I cried as I walked through the cemetery, especially the section where brothers rest side by side, and the graves of the unknown marked “December 7, 1941.”    It is humbling beyond any words I can find to describe.
 
   On a very personal note I hope “Days of Infamy,” though a work of fiction, pays honor to their memories.    Of all the moments in the book, as we were writing it, two haunt me the most.   One is the casualty clearing area aboard Enterprise after it is hit.   I garnered much of that experience from interviewing an officer who was aboard the fabled “Franklin” when it was hit, later in the war.    The other was a scene involving a young pilot, surviving three missions in one day, sitting alone in the twilight, that came from interviewing a beloved high school teacher of many years ago, a Wildcat pilot from the Battle of Midway, and how he felt after the fight was over and the realization came that he was still alive, but his life was changed forever.   
 
   And finally a “product endorsement” for a wonderful series.   If you are not already watching it, check out the History Channel’s  “Battle 360.”   It is incredible, the interweaving of CGI and real footage. . .if you are interested in the story of the fabled CV-6 Enterprise, you’ll be enthralled.
 
More this week after I get back from the tour.
 
Sincerely,
 
Bill F.


TagTag | Email Email | Print Print
Comments
By John Ansell @ Friday, May 09, 2008 12:49 PM
Many thanks for that answer and insight. You're the first to take the question head on. Bravo!!!

By concepts2 @ Wednesday, May 07, 2008 5:22 PM
I might be showing my age a bit, but I vaguely remember Mr. Kuralt's reports when I was a child. My dad was a truck driver, and had been to many of the places Charles reported from.

I fondly remember those moments when dad would pass along those extra tidbits that network television didn't have time to relate, which is probably why I anticipate your new book so much. Words come cheap, but a story... The play's the thing, I believe sir William once said.

Please post more often!

By Anonymous @ Tuesday, May 06, 2008 10:02 AM
Gentlemen: I have had the privilege of narrating /Pearl Harbor/ for the Library of Congress Talking Books program, and have made a list of the typographical and editorial errors I encountered (e.g.- Argentina for Argentia; lamented for laminated; etc.). If a reprint or new edition is planned, I will be happy to share these with you -- even tho the book is a novel, these kinds of errors are distracting, to say the least. Please let me know if I may help.

By Anonymous @ Monday, May 05, 2008 2:31 AM
Bill,
I first read your "1945" years ago (which I still have and now with both of you and Newt's signatures) and thought about the possibility of the scenario you proposed in the book because I have been teaching similar "what if's" for years. For example, would the United States exist today in her present form had Mary Queen of Scots decided not to return to Scotland? Probably not! Her son James the sixth of Scotland and James the first of England would not have been born with the Scots probably migrating to France and not to the English colonies in America via Northern Ireland. They also would have probably fought with the French against the English during the French and Indian War. Sorry, I digress here, back to the subject at hand.

I had the opportunity to meet both you and Newt in Hawaii last year and hope at some point you would return with your new effort. Just finished "Days of Infamy" almost in one sitting and am preparing to hunker down and reread it, albeit a little more slowly this time. What a great story! Most importantly, we should be thankful Nagumo did lead the attack force and not Yamamoto.

I used to tell my students that, in my view, the turning point of the war in the Pacific was not Midway, but Nagumo's failure to send that 3rd wave as described in your "Pearl Harbor". In fact, my cousin, Harry Gailey and I used to get in some interesting discussions about my scenario of the turning point of the conflict. Of course Harry wrote numerous books about the War in the Pacific, but I was never convince nor could I ever change his mind either.

Not wishing to provide and "spoilers" here, but I do wish to comment on the strategy you unfold with the Japanese Battleships and their movements. All I can say that it was terrific tactical move and very plausible since I do live here on Oahu.

You guys have written a terrific sequel and I hope you will continue with this series until the conclusion of the conflict. However, having said that, that could very well end up with enough books to rival Morrison's work on the Naval history of WWII.

Mahalo and Aloha from Hawaii
Bob Gailey

By Anonymous @ Saturday, May 03, 2008 6:05 PM
Reply for John,

Great question John and frankly, I am not sure I can give you an accurate answer to your question but I'll try. Guam was strategically located at a place in the Pacific, especially after the advent of air power, that made it a natural stepping stone for the range of aircraft of that time. It had traded hands many times across the previous four hundred years as well. I think, that in 1945, having built it up as a major base of operations after taking it back from the Japanese, we felt a need to maintain presence, to this day. Recall that during the Vietnam War, it was the staging area for our B-52 missions. In contrast, Taiwan, so close off the coast of China, was in a different geopolitical situation. Conquered by the Japanese and used as a training center by them, there was actually intense debate in 1944 whether we should bypass it, or invade it. If we had directly liberated it from the Japanese in 1944 its current situation might be different. . .yet again, another "what if" of history. It's real political/military significance hit when the Nationalist Forces collapsed in their fight against the Communists and the island became the fall back position, with our fleet providing security for the millions of refugees who fled there to escape Mao. Taiwan became the refugee center for so many who rightly feared the Maoists, and became the "other China." A very personal opinion here, not in any way endorsed by Newt or others who take care of this site, I feel that Taiwan is as a legitimate nation as South Korea (and South Vietnam once was) and deserves our continued support. It is not a province of China, it is a free and independent nation. (hope that doesn't blow my next visa application to that country!)

Sincerely,

Bill Forstchen


By John Ansell @ Friday, May 02, 2008 7:41 PM
Can't wait to get the book and read it, Bill. On another note, I was just thinking about Saturday's vote in Guam. Sure it's only 4 delegates but something struck me. Why is Guam a territory and why not Taiwan? I know you stated that you started your books of with a "What If" so maybe I can get an answer on this: What if the USA took Taiwan as a territory when Japan surrendered?

I'm biased because my wife was born in Taiwan and her family is constantly working for Taiwan's independence from China.

Click Here to post a comment

About Newt

Contact

Internships

FAQ's

Terms of Use

 
Powered By: Powered By iBelong Networks
spacer