|
|
|
|
| A Book Review of Days of Infamy by Warren Kelly |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally published here
Newt Gingrich and William R. Forstchen have teamed up before; their trilogy of alternate Civil War history was received quite well. In that series, they examined the consequences of a Confederate victory in July 1863, and the outcome of Lee's assault on Washington, D.C. Before that, in the ill-fated 1945, they showed us a world where the Third Reich dominates Europe and threatens the United States.
This current series started with Pearl Harbor; in fact, if you have not read that book, this book, though entertaining, won't make as much sense. Pearl Harbor establishes the "point of divergence" in this alternate history - Yamamoto himself is present during the attack on Pearl Harbor, and a third assault is launched against the island, causing more material damage and generating more chaos than it did in "real life." Days of Infamy shows what happens as a result of that divergence.
The United States Navy is reeling after the attack in Hawaii, but the hunt for the Japanese fleet is on. Of course, Yamamoto is searching for the American carriers, and has a carefully laid trap set for them. The American carrier groups are split, and are forced to observe strict radio silence to prevent the Japanese fleet from finding them. It's a complex naval chess game, played out in the Pacific Ocean, with real casualties. The inexperience of the American troops is highlighted, as many of the pilots flying into combat have only recently graduated from flight school. Many don't make it to their second mission, falling prey to the superior Japanese planes and pilots.
The thing I appreciate most about this book is how believable it is. As with their Civil War series, Gingrich and Forstchen have crafted a narrative that sounds like it really happened. The benefit of alternate histories is their ability to make us think about how important one minor event can be to the outcome of a battle, a war, and more. As bad as the attack on Pearl Harbor was, it could have been much worse, and the aftermath could have been vastly different from what we read in the history books.
The characters in the Days of Infamy are very true to life, though there's not much development in the narrative. Of course, the events of the book take place between 7:45 PM on December 7 and 10:00 AM on December 11, so there's not a lot of time for characters to develop and change. But Gingrich and Forstchen have packed a lot into 3 1/2 days. The pacing of the book can sometimes leave you breathless, and more than once I found myself reading "just one more page" after I'd just finished two chapters. This is a great beach read for people who don't always read beach books. |
|
|
|
Tag
| Email |
Print
|
| Comments |
By
Anonymous @
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 3:34 PM
|
If you read "My Responses to Your Questions," you'll see detailed grievances I have with the "history" in these alternative history books.
If you also read my first post, you'd note I listed history books which provided a better picture of events leading to the Pacific War.
|
|
|
By
Anonymous @
Friday, June 13, 2008 12:28 PM
|
|
Again, there is a link right off the front page on the right at the top that invites you to share your thoughts with Bill. I would appreciate seeing his responses to your criticisms, but still doesn't seem that you want to publicly share them...
|
|
|
By
Anonymous @
Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:40 PM
|
Wow ... testy. 'Put your money where your mouth is...."
I have listed many problems, especially on my reviews on Barnes and Noble and Amazon. My first comment in this string listed better histories to read to understand the environment.
I had originally contacted Mr. Gingrich's site in effort to discuss the historical fallacies listed as "cornerstones" of the book, especially the extremely distorted view of the Imperial Japanese Navy, the Imperial General Headquarters, and Japanese strategy and operations.
I, too, am a historian and my thesis dealt with the opening campaign of the Pacific War; hence my understanding of these errors.
|
|
|
By
Anonymous @
Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:10 PM
|
|
Well historian Bill Forstchen, who is a co-author, is blogging on the site and taking questions, so put your money where your mouth is and point out this historical myths you talk about. I personally enjoyed the book very much and found the history really came alive for me
|
|
|
By
Anonymous @
Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:40 PM
|
A response to the response....
This book is listed as "historical fiction," therefore it needs to be based on history not promulgated myths desperately clung to for security. The concept of this series is sound--the influence of one different decision (in this case, Yamamoto leading the Kido Butai, not Nagumo); however, the historical research placed into this book is incredibly disappointing.
Too many people are enthralled with the authors and willing to discount the problems with their historical research.
|
|
|
By
Anonymous @
Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:34 PM
|
To the previous commenter:
THE BOOK IS FICTION -- ITS NOT TRYING TO PRESENT EVENTS AS THEY HAPPENED BUT AS THEY MIGHT HAVE
...geez, some people
|
|
|
By
Anonymous @
Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:10 AM
|
"The thing I appreciate most about this book is how believable it is."
It is believable to those who do not fully understand Japan's strategy, campaign or tactics opening the Pacific War. Based on the many popular myths about the raid AT Pearl Harbor (The U.S. Pacific Fleet anchored in Pearl Harbor was attacked on 7 December 1941, not Pearl Harbor itself), this novel (and its predecessor "Pearl Harbor") do a great injustice to all the histories which have peeled back the many myths of the raid to present the true history.
There are an incredible number of books to read regarding the opening of the Pacific War, based on historical facts vice popular myths. I principally recommend the works of H.P Willmott: EMPIRES IN THE BALANCE, THE GATHERING STORM (co-author) or PEARL HARBOR (2001 edition). Evans and Peattie's KAIGUN is another good book. Read Weintraub's LONG DAY'S JOURNEY INTO WAR or Young's FIRST 24 HOURS OF THE PACIFIC WAR.
|
|
|
Click Here to post a comment
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|